Zerona is a body treatment used to remove fat by targeting specific parts of your body using light. On the other hand, CoolSculpting eliminates fat by using cold temperatures. If you want to learn more about the differences between Zerona and CoolSculpting, continue reading below.
The Main Difference Between Zerona And CoolSculpting
Zerona treatment shrinks fat cells by generating ATP (adenosine triphosphate). ATP attacks the cell membrane of fats and drains it out, which results in shrinking. On the other hand, CoolSculpting freezes fat cells and kills them, thereby removing them from your body through the lymphatic system.
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Procedure
Zerona utilizes laser technology by aiming at target body areas to shrink fats. The laser penetrates the cell membrane to shrink adipose/ fat cells. In this approach, the fat cells remain and are not entirely removed and still contribute to keeping your body fat percentage at normal levels. With Zerona treatment, you will not feel anything at all.
Moreover, Zerona treatment offers an overall slimming effect that helps reduce thigh, arm, neck, back, chest, and waist fats. In one study, researchers observed that patients lost as much as 3.51 inches around their hips, waists, and thighs in just two weeks after starting the treatment.
On the other hand, CoolSculpting uses frigid temperatures to crystallize or freeze fat cells, eliminating them. Either massage or radio waves are utilized on a specific body part to break the hardened fat cells so your body can flush them out naturally. You can expect feelings such as intense cold, tingling, aching, stinging, mild pinching, and cramping during treatment.
People who undergo CoolSculpting treat their belly, thighs, lower back, and sides. It can reduce cellulitis that is on your arms, buttocks, legs. In one study, researchers have found that CoolSculpting reduces fat on the treated area by 25 percent.
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Cost
Zerona usually costs about $1,500 to $1,700 for a six-treatment package done within two weeks inside a doctor’s clinic. Every treatment typically lasts for 40 minutes. CoolSculpting, on the other hand, costs about $2,000 and $5,000, depending on the treatment area.
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Recovery
Suppose you are worried about not getting to do the activities you need to do after treatment. In that case, you do not have to because, after a Zerona or CoolSculpting session, you can resume your normal daily activities without a problem.
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Effectiveness
By undergoing a two-week treatment with Zerona, you can lose about 3 to 4 inches of fat minimum and 9 inches maximum, though this may differ from one person to another. In CoolSculpting, you can reach up to 80 percent of fat reduction following a single treatment.
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: How Long Does They Last?
With Zerona treatment, you can notice results after six treatments. The results are permanent but can change with pregnancy or weight gain. Therefore, patients must exercise and eat healthily to maintain their bodies after a series of Zerona sessions.
According to a Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology study, undergoing cryolipolysis or CoolSculpting can enjoy results for up to 9 years post-treatment.
Zerona Vs. CoolSculpting: Risk or Side Effects
The good news is Zerona does not cause any harmful side effects on patients. Also, the safety and efficacy of CoolSculpting have been verified by the Food and Drug Administration during clinical trials. Cryolipolysis does not increase fat levels in the blood and poses no harm to your liver.
Zerona Vs. CoolSculpting: Insurance Coverage
Unfortunately, both Zerona and CoolSculpting treatments are aesthetic or cosmetic treatments that are not part of insurance plans.
Zerona Vs. CoolSculpting: Pros & Cons
Zerona
Pros:
Cons:
CoolSculpting
Pros:
Cons:
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Quick Comparison Table
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Quick Comparison Table | ||
|---|---|---|
Item: | Zerona: | CoolSculpting: |
Procedure: | Fat shrinking through laser therapy | Fat removal through freezing temperature |
Body Areas: | Arms, neck, back, chest, waist | Arms, buttocks, legs |
Cost: | It costs about $1,500 to $1,700 to patient for package of 6 treatments | It costs about $2,000-$5,000 cost to patient per session (depending on the number of areas of the treatment) |
Recovery Time: | None | None |
Effectiveness: | Reduces up to 9 inches with after several sessions | Eliminates up to 80% of body fat within a few session |
Last Time: | Results are permanent but can change with pregnancy and weight change | Up to 9 years |
Side Effects: | No harmful side effects | No harmful side effects |
Candidate: | Healthy person with stable weight | Healthy person with stable weight |
Insurance Coverage: | None | None |
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Which is Better?
It is difficult to tell which is better since results will depend from person to person. If you want results after a few sessions, CoolSculpting is the best option. If you don’t want to feel anything during treatment, Zerona is the best for you.
Zerona vs. CoolSculpting: Who is a Good Candidate?
The best candidates for both treatments are those who are healthy and are not significantly overweight. Note that Zerona treatment is not suitable for those with lymphatic, kidney, cardiovascular diseases, and pregnant women.
Final Verdict
Zerona and CoolSculpting are noninvasive treatments that use different methods of removing or reducing fat. If you want to save more money and get quick results, you can opt for CoolSculpting. If you are sensitive and do not want to feel anything during and after treatment, Zerona is your best choice.